Background: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of a novel synthetic material (TMS-1) with polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, and primary closure of experimentally fashioned clean and contaminated abdominal wounds.
Methods: One square centimeter full-thickness abdominal wall defects were created in each of the four abdominal quadrants of anesthetized rats (n = 6). Patches of polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, and a polyurethane-polypropylene composite material (TMS-1) were used to repair three of these defects; the fourth was primarily closed. A second group of rats (n = 9) underwent the same operative protocol; however, peritonitis was induced at the time of operation by using the fecal inoculation technique. Animals were killed 2 to 3 weeks later, and surface area and severity of formed adhesions were assessed.
Results: By all methods of assessment, primary closure proved significantly superior to all other methods of closure in clean and contaminated conditions. The three synthetic materials were equally matched for surface area involved in adhesion formation. When compared with the other synthetic materials, TMS-1 was associated with significantly milder adhesions in uninfected (p < 0.002) and in infected (p < 0.002) conditions.
Conclusions: The clear superiority of TMS-1 over other nonabsorbable synthetic materials shown in this pilot study warrants further investigation relative to its use to close large abdominal wall defects.