Objective: To compare patient outcomes when percutaneous feeding tubes were changed routinely each month or only when necessary (prn).
Design: Prospective, randomized, nonblinded crossover study of 6 months of routine monthly changes compared with 6 months of prn changes.
Setting: 416-bed long-term-care facility.
Patients: 26 permanent residents with nutrition managed through percutaneous gastrostomy or jejunostomy feeding tubes. The median age was 61.5 years; 8 (31%) also had tracheostomies, and 3 (12%) had indwelling urinary catheters.
Results: The frequency of feeding tube changes was 40 per 1,000 patient-days during the 6 months of routine tube changes and 14 per 1,000 when tubes were changed prn (P < .001). There were no differences between the two study periods in frequency of stoma site infections, fever, episodes of emesis, and total antibiotic courses. The median duration in situ of feeding tubes with prn changes was 104 days. For both periods, feeding tubes were significantly more likely to fall out and require replacement with-in 24 hours of previous tube replacement.
Conclusion: There were no observed differences in clinical outcomes in long-term-care facility patients when feeding tubes were changed only as necessary as compared to routine monthly changes.