The objectives of this work were to apply several profile comparison approaches to dissolution data of four different but bioequivalent metoprolol tartrate tablet formulations to (1) identify the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, (2) quantify the metric for comparing dissolution profiles of each method, (3) determine metric limits that are consistent with the observed bioequivalence, and (4) rationalize the observed metric limits with respect to the role of dissolution in overall metoprolol absorption. Dissolution was performed by the USP monograph method on four formulations of metoprolol tartrate tablets (Lopressor plus fast, medium, and slow dissolving test formulations). Three general approaches to compare dissolution profiles were examined; they were ANOVA-based, model-independent, and model-dependent approaches. It is concluded that model-independent approaches and several model-dependent approaches yielded numerical results that can serve as objective and quantitative metrics for comparing entire dissolution profiles of the four metoprolol tartrate formulations. However, these methods presented complications. Some metrics were dependent on the length of the dissolution profile and the sampling scheme. Results from the pairwise procedures also depended on the pairing assignment of individual profiles. In spite of complications, these methods suggested wide dissolution specification limits. Wide dissolution specifications were rationalized through an analysis of in vitro-in vivo relationships, which indicated metoprolol dissolution from these formulations was not the rate-limiting step; hence, a range of dissolution profiles can be expected to yield equivalent plasma profiles.