Comparison of pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy performed by one surgeon

World J Surg. 1997 Jul-Aug;21(6):640-3. doi: 10.1007/s002689900286.

Abstract

Pancreatogastrostomy (PG) for restoring pancreaticoenteric continuity after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has been recommended by a few surgeons on the basis of certain theoretic and practical advantages of this procedure over pancreatojejunostomy (PJ). The purpose of this study was to determine whether PG can be a safe alternative to PJ. Eighty-six PDs performed by the same surgeon for periampullary carcinoma were analysed to compare early and late postoperative results of PJ (n = 38) and PG (n = 48). The two groups were comparable for age, sex, diagnosis, stage, and operation time. PJ leakage developed in six patients (15.8%) and PG leakage in one (2.1%) (p < 0.05). Overall rates of morbidity/hospital mortality were 34.2/7.9% and 18.8/4.2% in the PJ and PG groups, respectively. In conclusion, PG showed a more favorable early outcome than PJ. PG is recommended for surgeons who encounter difficulties with PJ for reconstruction after PD.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Ampulla of Vater
  • Common Bile Duct Neoplasms / surgery
  • Duodenal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Female
  • Gastrostomy*
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pancreas / surgery*
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms / surgery
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy*
  • Pancreaticojejunostomy*
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Retrospective Studies