Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003 Apr;92(2):92-8.
doi: 10.1016/s1475-4916(03)00007-9.

Homeopathic Aggravations: A Systematic Review of Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials

Affiliations
Review

Homeopathic Aggravations: A Systematic Review of Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials

S Grabia et al. Homeopathy. .

Abstract

Homeopathic aggravations have often been described anecdotally. However, few attempts have been made to scientifically verify their existence. This systematic review aimed at comparing the frequency of homeopathic aggravations in the placebo and verum groups of double-blind, randomised clinical trials. Eight independent literature searches were carried out to identify all such trials mentioning either adverse effects or aggravations. All studies thus found were validated and data were extracted by both authors. Twenty-four trials could be included. The average number of aggravations was low. In total, 50 aggravations were attributed to patients treated with placebo and 63 to patients treated with homoeopathically diluted remedies. We conclude that this systematic review does not provide clear evidence that the phenomenon of homeopathic aggravations exists.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 articles

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback