Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 Apr;69(7):533-97.
doi: 10.1080/15287390500260945.

A Combined Analysis of North American Case-Control Studies of Residential Radon and Lung Cancer

Multicenter Study

A Combined Analysis of North American Case-Control Studies of Residential Radon and Lung Cancer

Daniel Krewski et al. J Toxicol Environ Health A. .


Cohort studies have consistently shown underground miners exposed to high levels of radon to be at excess risk of lung cancer, and extrapolations based on those results indicate that residential radon may be responsible for nearly 10-15% of all lung cancer deaths per year in the United States. However, case-control studies of residential radon and lung cancer have provided ambiguous evidence of radon lung cancer risks. Regardless, alpha-particle emissions from the short-lived radioactive radon decay products can damage cellular DNA. The possibility that a demonstrated lung carcinogen may be present in large numbers of homes raises a serious public health concern. Thus, a systematic analysis of pooled data from all North American residential radon studies was undertaken to provide a more direct characterization of the public health risk posed by prolonged radon exposure. To evaluate the risk associated with prolonged residential radon exposure, a combined analysis of the primary data from seven large scale case-control studies of residential radon and lung cancer risk was conducted. The combined data set included a total of 4081 cases and 5281 controls, representing the largest aggregation of data on residential radon and lung cancer conducted to date. Residential radon concentrations were determined primarily by a-track detectors placed in the living areas of homes of the study subjects in order to obtain an integrated 1-yr average radon concentration in indoor air. Conditional likelihood regression was used to estimate the excess risk of lung cancer due to residential radon exposure, with adjustment for attained age, sex, study, smoking factors, residential mobility, and completeness of radon measurements. Although the main analyses were based on the combined data set as a whole, we also considered subsets of the data considered to have more accurate radon dosimetry. This included a subset of the data involving 3662 cases and 4966 controls with a-track radon measurements within the exposure time window (ETW) 5-30 yr prior to the index date considered previously by Krewski et al. (2005). Additional restrictions focused on subjects for which a greater proportion of the ETW was covered by measured rather than imputed radon concentrations, and on subjects who occupied at most two residences. The estimated odds ratio (OR) of lung cancer generally increased with radon concentration. The OR trend was consistent with linearity (p = .10), and the excess OR (EOR) was 0.10 per Bq/m3 with 95% confidence limits (-0.01, 0.26). For the subset of the data considered previously by Krewski et al. (2005), the EOR was 0.11 (0.00, 0.28). Further limiting subjects based on our criteria (residential stability and completeness of radon monitoring) expected to improve radon dosimetry led to increased estimates of the EOR. For example, for subjects who had resided in only one or two houses in the 5-30 ETW and who had a-track radon measurements for at least 20 yr of this 25-yr period, the EOR was 0.18 (0.02, 0.43) per 100 Bq/m3. Both estimates are compatible with the EOR of 0.12 (0.02, 0.25) per 100 Bq/m3 predicted by downward extrapolation of the miner data. Collectively, these results provide direct evidence of an association between residential radon and lung cancer risk, a finding predicted by extrapolation of results from occupational studies of radon-exposed underground miners.

Similar articles

  • An overview of the North American residential radon and lung cancer case-control studies.
    Field RW, Krewski D, Lubin JH, Zielinski JM, Alavanja M, Catalan VS, Klotz JB, Létourneau EG, Lynch CF, Lyon JL, Sandler DP, Schoenberg JB, Steck DJ, Stolwijk JA, Weinberg C, Wilcox HB. Field RW, et al. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006 Apr;69(7):599-631. doi: 10.1080/15287390500260960. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006. PMID: 16608829 Review.
  • Indoor radon and lung cancer risk in connecticut and utah.
    Sandler DP, Weinberg CR, Shore DL, Archer VE, Stone MB, Lyon JL, Rothney-Kozlak L, Shepherd M, Stolwijk JA. Sandler DP, et al. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006 Apr;69(7):633-54. doi: 10.1080/15287390500261117. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006. PMID: 16608830
  • Case-control study of radon and lung cancer in New Jersey.
    Wilcox HB, Al-Zoughool M, Garner MJ, Jiang H, Klotz JB, Krewski D, Nicholson WJ, Schoenberg JB, Villeneuve PJ, Zielinski JM. Wilcox HB, et al. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;128(2):169-79. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncm330. Epub 2007 Jul 4. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008. PMID: 17611199
  • Residential radon and lung cancer: end of the story?
    Samet JM. Samet JM. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006 Apr;69(7):527-31. doi: 10.1080/15287390500260879. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006. PMID: 16608827
  • Radon.
    Bissett RJ, McLaughlin JR. Bissett RJ, et al. Chronic Dis Can. 2010;29 Suppl 1:38-50. Chronic Dis Can. 2010. PMID: 21199598 Review.
See all similar articles

Cited by 58 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms