Custom optimization of intraocular lens asphericity

Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2007;105:36-41; discussion 41-2.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the optimal amount of ocular spherical aberration (SA) in an intraocular lens (IOL) to maximize optical quality.

Methods: In 154 eyes of 94 patients aged 40 to 80 years, implantation of aspheric IOLs was simulated with different amounts of SA to produce residual ocular SA from -0.30 microm to +0.30 microm. Using the VOL-CT program (Sarver & Associates, Carbondale, Illinois), corneal wavefront aberrations up to 6th order were computed from corneal topographic elevation data (Humphrey Atlas, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, California). Using the ZernikeTool program (Advanced Medical Optics, Inc, Santa Ana, California), the polychromatic point spread function with Stiles-Crawford effect was calculated for the residual ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs, 3rd to 6th order, 6-mm pupil), assuming fully corrected 2nd-order aberrations. Five parameters were used to quantify optical image quality, and we determined the residual ocular SA at which the maximal image quality was achieved for each eye. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the predictors for optimal SA of each eye.

Results: The optimal SA varied widely among eyes. Most eyes had best image quality with low amounts of negative SA. For modulation transfer function volume up to 15 cycles/degree, the amount of optimal SA could be predicted based on other HOAs of the cornea with coefficient of multiple determination (R(2)) of 79%. Eight Zernike terms significantly contributed to the optimal SA in this model; the order of importance to optimal SA from most to least was: Z(6)(0), Z(6)2, Z(4)2, Z(5)3, Z(6)4, Z(3)(-1), Z(3)3, and Z(3)1. For the other 4 measures of visual quality, the coefficients of determination varied from 32% to 63%.

Conclusion: The amount of ocular SA producing best image quality varied widely among subjects and could be predicted based on corneal HOAs. Selection of an aspheric IOL should be customized according to the full spectrum of corneal HOAs and not 4th-order SA alone.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Humans
  • Lens Implantation, Intraocular / standards*
  • Lenses, Intraocular / adverse effects
  • Lenses, Intraocular / standards*
  • Middle Aged
  • Refraction, Ocular*
  • Refractive Errors / epidemiology*
  • Vision Disorders / epidemiology*
  • Vision Disparity