Blood volume-monitored regulation of ultrafiltration in fluid-overloaded hemodialysis patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials. 2012 Jun 8;13:79. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-79.

Abstract

Background: Data generated with the body composition monitor (BCM, Fresenius) show, based on bioimpedance technology, that chronic fluid overload in hemodialysis patients is associated with poor survival. However, removing excess fluid by lowering dry weight can be accompanied by intradialytic and postdialytic complications. Here, we aim at testing the hypothesis that, in comparison to conventional hemodialysis, blood volume-monitored regulation of ultrafiltration and dialysate conductivity (UCR) and/or regulation of ultrafiltration and temperature (UTR) will decrease complications when ultrafiltration volumes are systematically increased in fluid-overloaded hemodialysis patients.

Methods/design: BCM measurements yield results on fluid overload (in liters), relative to extracellular water (ECW). In this prospective, multicenter, triple-arm, parallel-group, crossover, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we use BCM measurements, routinely introduced in our three maintenance hemodialysis centers shortly prior to the start of the study, to recruit sixty hemodialysis patients with fluid overload (defined as ≥15% ECW). Patients are randomized 1:1:1 into UCR, UTR and conventional hemodialysis groups. BCM-determined, 'final' dry weight is set to normohydration weight -7% of ECW postdialysis, and reached by reducing the previous dry weight, in steps of 0.1 kg per 10 kg body weight, during 12 hemodialysis sessions (one study phase). In case of intradialytic complications, dry weight reduction is decreased, according to a prespecified algorithm. A comparison of intra- and post-dialytic complications among study groups constitutes the primary endpoint. In addition, we will assess relative weight reduction, changes in residual renal function, quality of life measures, and predialysis levels of various laboratory parameters including C-reactive protein, troponin T, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, before and after the first study phase (secondary outcome parameters).

Discussion: Patients are not requested to revert to their initial degree of fluid overload after each study phase. Therefore, the crossover design of the present study merely serves the purpose of secondary endpoint evaluation, for example to determine patient choice of treatment modality. Previous studies on blood volume monitoring have yielded inconsistent results. Since we include only patients with BCM-determined fluid overload, we expect a benefit for all study participants, due to strict fluid management, which decreases the mortality risk of hemodialysis patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01416753.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Austria
  • Blood Volume Determination*
  • Blood Volume*
  • Body Composition
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Electric Conductivity
  • Hemodiafiltration* / adverse effects
  • Hemodiafiltration* / mortality
  • Humans
  • Kidney Diseases / diagnosis
  • Kidney Diseases / mortality
  • Kidney Diseases / physiopathology
  • Kidney Diseases / therapy*
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / methods*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Research Design*
  • Temperature
  • Time Factors
  • Water-Electrolyte Balance*
  • Water-Electrolyte Imbalance / diagnosis*
  • Water-Electrolyte Imbalance / mortality
  • Water-Electrolyte Imbalance / physiopathology
  • Water-Electrolyte Imbalance / therapy
  • Weight Gain
  • Weight Loss

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01416753