Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;70(3):316-324.
doi: 10.1002/mus.28176. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

Refining quality measures for electrodiagnostic testing in suspected carpal tunnel syndrome to account for acceptable variations in practice: Expert review process

Collaborators, Affiliations

Refining quality measures for electrodiagnostic testing in suspected carpal tunnel syndrome to account for acceptable variations in practice: Expert review process

Kanaka D Shetty et al. Muscle Nerve. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Using a set of process-of-care quality measures for electrodiagnostic testing in suspected carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the research team previously documented large variations in electrodiagnostic testing practices and adherence to quality measures. This study sought to enhance the applicability and validity of the quality measures by integrating acceptable variations in testing practices.

Methods: We recruited 13 expert electrodiagnostic medicine specialists from five specialty societies. The experts iteratively refined five quality measures, and then rated the validity of the refined quality measures (1-9 scale). During this process, the experts reviewed data on adherence to existing quality measures and variations in electrodiagnostic testing practices, and considered recently published quality measures from the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine.

Results: Three quality measures (electrodiagnostic testing before surgery for CTS, temperature assessment during electrodiagnostic testing, and electrodiagnostic criteria for severe median neuropathy) underwent few refinements and were rated valid (medians 8-9). Two measures (essential components of electrodiagnosis, criteria for interpreting electrodiagnostic tests as median neuropathy) were judged valid (medians 8) after revisions. For these measures, experts' ratings on the recommended components of sensory or mixed nerve conduction studies varied: agreement among the experts about the use of sensory peak latency was greater than for onset latency or sensory velocity.

Discussion: This study produced quality measures that provide minimum standards for electrodiagnostic testing for suspected CTS that are more comprehensive and nuanced than prior versions. Future work can assess the feasibility, reliability, and validity of these refined measures in diverse physician practices.

Keywords: carpal tunnel syndrome; electrodiagnosis; median neuropathy; process assessment; quality measures; quality of health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635‐2645. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa022615
    1. 2019 national healthcare quality and disparities report. (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) 2020.
    1. Nuckols T, Conlon C, Robbins M, et al. Quality of care for work‐associated Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Occup Environ Med. 2017;59(1):47‐53. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000916
    1. Aragaki D, Basu A, Conlon C, et al. Quality of electrodiagnostic testing for carpal tunnel syndrome: adherence to quality measures. Muscle Nerve. 2020;62(1):50‐59. doi:10.1002/mus.26858
    1. Sandin KJ, Asch SM, Jablecki CK, Kilmer DD, Nuckols TK. Carpal tunnel quality G. Clinical quality measures for electrodiagnosis in suspected carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2010;41(4):444‐452. doi:10.1002/mus.21617

MeSH terms