Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1976 1
1977 1
1978 3
1979 5
1980 3
1981 4
1982 4
1983 5
1984 4
1985 7
1986 6
1987 4
1988 4
1989 11
1990 12
1991 8
1992 11
1993 16
1994 14
1995 14
1996 15
1997 13
1998 16
1999 17
2000 29
2001 19
2002 21
2003 20
2004 29
2005 35
2006 29
2007 27
2008 37
2009 39
2010 40
2011 42
2012 46
2013 46
2014 43
2015 47
2016 35
2017 40
2018 42
2019 40
2020 47
2021 44
2022 33
2023 44
2024 23

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

985 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Ascertainment Bias in Anaphylaxis Safety Data of COVID-19 Vaccines.
Hourihane JO, Byrne AM, Blümchen K, Turner PJ, Greenhawt M. Hourihane JO, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jul;9(7):2562-2566. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.04.025. Epub 2021 May 4. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021. PMID: 34246432 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
SNP ascertainment bias in population genetic analyses: why it is important, and how to correct it.
Lachance J, Tishkoff SA. Lachance J, et al. Bioessays. 2013 Sep;35(9):780-6. doi: 10.1002/bies.201300014. Epub 2013 Jul 9. Bioessays. 2013. PMID: 23836388 Free PMC article. Review.
In this short review, we use comparisons between high-coverage whole genome sequences of African hunter-gatherers and data from genotyping arrays to highlight how SNP ascertainment bias distorts population genetic inferences. Sample sizes and the populations in whic …
In this short review, we use comparisons between high-coverage whole genome sequences of African hunter-gatherers and data from genotyping a …
How imputation can mitigate SNP ascertainment Bias.
Geibel J, Reimer C, Pook T, Weigend S, Weigend A, Simianer H. Geibel J, et al. BMC Genomics. 2021 May 12;22(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07663-6. BMC Genomics. 2021. PMID: 33980139 Free PMC article.
RESULTS: The strategy was first tested by simulating additional ascertainment bias with a set of 1566 chickens from 74 populations that were genotyped for the positions of the Affymetrix Axiom 580 k Genome-Wide Chicken Array. ...CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight th …
RESULTS: The strategy was first tested by simulating additional ascertainment bias with a set of 1566 chickens from 74 populat …
Ascertainment Bias and Estimating Penetrance.
Sorscher S. Sorscher S. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;4(4):587. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4573. JAMA Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29285541 No abstract available.
Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
Viera AJ, Bangdiwala SI. Viera AJ, et al. Fam Med. 2007 Feb;39(2):132-7. Fam Med. 2007. PMID: 17273956 Free article.
Keeping knowledge of subjects' assignment after allocation from subjects, investigators/health care providers, or those assessing outcomes is referred to as masking (also known as blinding). The goal of masking is to prevent ascertainment bias. In contrast to alloca …
Keeping knowledge of subjects' assignment after allocation from subjects, investigators/health care providers, or those assessing outcomes i …
A case study of ascertainment bias for the primary outcome in the Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE) trial.
Esserman DA, Gill TM, Miller ME, Greene EJ, Dziura JD, Travison TG, Meng C, Peduzzi PN. Esserman DA, et al. Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;18(2):207-214. doi: 10.1177/1740774520980070. Epub 2021 Mar 7. Clin Trials. 2021. PMID: 33678038 Free PMC article.
We determined the effect of ascertainment bias on study power for the revised (Types 1 and 2a) versus original definition (Types 1, 2a, and 2b). RESULTS: The estimate of ascertainment bias was 1.14 (95% confidence interval: 0.98, 1.30), providing evide …
We determined the effect of ascertainment bias on study power for the revised (Types 1 and 2a) versus original definition (Typ …
Ascertainment bias in the genomic test of positive selection on regulatory sequences.
Jiang D, Zhang J. Jiang D, et al. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Aug 21:2023.08.20.554030. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.20.554030. bioRxiv. 2023. PMID: 37662307 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
Applying this test genomically to all experimentally identified binding sites of three TFs in humans, a recent study reported positive selection for elevated binding affinities of TFBSs. Here we show that this genomic test suffers from an ascertainment bias because, …
Applying this test genomically to all experimentally identified binding sites of three TFs in humans, a recent study reported positive selec …
How array design creates SNP ascertainment bias.
Geibel J, Reimer C, Weigend S, Weigend A, Pook T, Simianer H. Geibel J, et al. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 30;16(3):e0245178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245178. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33784304 Free PMC article.
This affects population genetic estimators and is known as SNP ascertainment bias. We investigated factors contributing to ascertainment bias in array development by redesigning the Axiom Genome-Wide Chicken Array in silico and evaluating changes in al …
This affects population genetic estimators and is known as SNP ascertainment bias. We investigated factors contributing to …
985 results