Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2016 2
2017 5
2018 4
2019 5
2020 4
2021 3
2022 6
2023 4
2024 0

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

29 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Outcome switching in randomized controlled oncology trials reporting on surrogate endpoints: a cross-sectional analysis.
Falk Delgado A, Falk Delgado A. Falk Delgado A, et al. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 23;7(1):9206. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09553-y. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28835682 Free PMC article.
Despite this, factors associated with poor practice such as outcome switching in clinical trials are poorly understood. We performed a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the prevalence of, and the factors associated with outcome switching. ...For-pro …
Despite this, factors associated with poor practice such as outcome switching in clinical trials are poorly understood. We per …
High incidence of outcome switching observed in follow-up publications of randomized controlled trials: Meta-research study.
Kampman JM, Sperna Weiland NH, Hollmann MW, Repping S, Hermanides J. Kampman JM, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:236-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 15. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 34004339 Free article.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of outcome switching in follow-up publications of randomized controlled trials. Outcome switching leads to bias where treatment benefits are more likely to be overestimated or based on chance. ...
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of outcome switching in follow-up publications of randomized controlled trials. Outc …
Undisclosed outcome switching, undisclosed analysis switching, inappropriate rounding, and selective reporting render paper "Effectiveness of a minimally processed food-based nutritional counselling intervention on weight gain in overweight pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial" unreliable.
Peña A, Gibney M, Hall K, Kyle TK, Brown AW, Allison DB. Peña A, et al. Eur J Nutr. 2023 Aug;62(5):2333-2335. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03146-4. Epub 2023 May 3. Eur J Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37133531 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
Completeness of reporting and outcome switching in trials published in Indian journals from 2017 to 2019: A cross-sectional study.
Warrier K, Jayanthi CR. Warrier K, et al. Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):77-81. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_64_20. Epub 2021 Jan 8. Perspect Clin Res. 2022. PMID: 35573453 Free PMC article.
However, incomplete or biased reporting of trials can hamper the process of review of trials and their results. Outcome switching, intentional, or otherwise leads to biased reporting and can result in false inferences. AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze the …
However, incomplete or biased reporting of trials can hamper the process of review of trials and their results. Outcome switching …
Reply to "Undisclosed outcome switching, undisclosed analysis switching, inappropriate rounding, and selective reporting render paper 'Effectiveness of a minimally processed food based nutritional counselling intervention on weight gain in overweight pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial' unreliable".
Sartorelli DS, Diez-Garcia RW, Franco LJ. Sartorelli DS, et al. Eur J Nutr. 2023 Aug;62(5):2337-2339. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03147-3. Epub 2023 May 4. Eur J Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37140646 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review.
Butcher NJ, Mew EJ, Monsour A, Chan AW, Moher D, Offringa M. Butcher NJ, et al. Trials. 2020 Jul 8;21(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04440-w. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32641085 Free PMC article. Review.
A lack of complete and transparent reporting of the investigated trial outcomes limits reproducibility of results and knowledge synthesis efforts, and contributes to outcome switching and other reporting biases. Outcome-specific extensions for the Standard Protocol …
A lack of complete and transparent reporting of the investigated trial outcomes limits reproducibility of results and knowledge synthesis ef …
Searching for evidence in neonatology.
Saugstad OD, Kirpalani H. Saugstad OD, et al. Acta Paediatr. 2023 Aug;112(8):1648-1652. doi: 10.1111/apa.16815. Epub 2023 May 31. Acta Paediatr. 2023. PMID: 37151193 Review.
29 results