Search Page
Save citations to file
Email citations
Send citations to clipboard
Add to Collections
Add to My Bibliography
Create a file for external citation management software
Your saved search
Your RSS Feed
Filters
Results by year
Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.
Year | Number of Results |
---|---|
2003 | 1 |
2023 | 1 |
2024 | 1 |
Search Results
2 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Quoted phrase not found in phrase index: "Pinhole visual acuity 1.1 LogMAR"
Page 1
Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Aug;87(8):988-93. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.8.988.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003.
PMID: 12881342
Free PMC article.
METHODS: Monocular logMAR visual acuity with and without a pinhole was assessed by orthoptists. ...The prevalence of amblyopia was approximately 45% lower in the children who received preschool screening than in those who did not (1.1% v …
METHODS: Monocular logMAR visual acuity with and without a pinhole was assessed by orthoptists. ...The prevalenc …
Comparison of standard versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: 5-year outcomes from the Save Sight Keratoconus Registry.
Kandel H, Abbondanza M, Gupta A, Mills R, Watson AS, Petsoglou C, Kerdraon Y, Watson SL.
Kandel H, et al.
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jan;38(1):95-102. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02641-6. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
Eye (Lond). 2024.
PMID: 37369766
Free PMC article.
The adjusted mean changes (95% CI) in outcomes were better in standard CXL than in accelerated CXL [visual acuity gain, 10.2 (7.9-12.5) vs 4.9 (1.6-8.2) logMAR letters; pinhole visual acuity 5.7 (3.5-7.8) vs 0.2 (-2.2 to 2.5) logMAR …
The adjusted mean changes (95% CI) in outcomes were better in standard CXL than in accelerated CXL [visual acuity gain, 10.2 ( …
Item in Clipboard
Cite
Cite