Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2011 1
2013 1
2014 1
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 1
2019 1
2021 1
2023 1
2024 0

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

8 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Short implants versus longer implants with maxillary sinus lift. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cruz RS, Lemos CAA, Batista VES, Oliveira HFFE, Gomes JML, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR. Cruz RS, et al. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e86. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0086. Epub 2018 Sep 13. Braz Oral Res. 2018. PMID: 30231176 Free article. Review.

However, higher rates of biological complications for long implants associated with maxillary sinus augmentation were observed (p < 0.00001; RR: 0.21; 95%CI: 0.10-0.41), whereas a higher prosthetic complication rate for short implants was noted (p = 0.010; RR: 3.

However, higher rates of biological complications for long implants associated with maxillary sinus augmentation were observed (p < 0.000

The all-on-four treatment concept: a systematic review.
Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR. Patzelt SB, et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):836-55. doi: 10.1111/cid.12068. Epub 2013 Apr 5. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014. PMID: 23560986 Review.
A total of 1,201 prostheses were incorporated within 48 hours after the surgery. The major prosthetic complication was the fracture of the all-acrylic FDP. The mean cumulative SR/SR (standard deviation) (36 months) of implants and prostheses were 99.0 1.0% and 99.9 …
A total of 1,201 prostheses were incorporated within 48 hours after the surgery. The major prosthetic complication was the fra …
Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lemos CA, de Souza Batista VE, Almeida DA, Santiago Júnior JF, Verri FR, Pellizzer EP. Lemos CA, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr;115(4):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Nov 14. J Prosthet Dent. 2016. PMID: 26589441 Review.
The implant survival rate was higher for the cement-retained prosthesis (P =.01; RR: 0.49; CI: 0.28 to 0.85), and the prosthetic complication rate was higher for the screw-retained prosthesis (P =.04; RR: 0.52; CI: 0.28 to 0.98). ...However, the small difference bet …
The implant survival rate was higher for the cement-retained prosthesis (P =.01; RR: 0.49; CI: 0.28 to 0.85), and the prosthetic c
Stratification of prosthetic complications by manufacturer in implant-supported restorations with a 5 years' follow-up: systematic review of the literature.
Storelli S, Scanferla M, Palandrani G, Mosca D, Romeo E. Storelli S, et al. Minerva Stomatol. 2017 Aug;66(4):178-191. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.17.04019-5. Epub 2017 May 31. Minerva Stomatol. 2017. PMID: 28569453 Review.
Prosthetic complications were divided into mechanical and technical complications, and reported in a table. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall 14.4% of prosthetic complication was found for a total of 6623 restorations followed for an average of 7.4 years (range 5-16 years …
Prosthetic complications were divided into mechanical and technical complications, and reported in a table. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall 14.4 …
Complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses fabricated with PEEK and PEKK framework: a systematic review.
Mishra SK, Bhasmey SR, Chowdhary R. Mishra SK, et al. Evid Based Dent. 2023 Dec;24(4):193. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00928-x. Epub 2023 Sep 6. Evid Based Dent. 2023. PMID: 37674039
The PEEK framework had shown adhesion issues as the most common prosthetic complication. Limited data were available on PEKK as framework material, so further long-term clinical trials are required....
The PEEK framework had shown adhesion issues as the most common prosthetic complication. Limited data were available on PEKK a …
Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review.
Chaar MS, Att W, Strub JR. Chaar MS, et al. J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Sep;38(9):697-711. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02209.x. Epub 2011 Mar 12. J Oral Rehabil. 2011. PMID: 21395638 Review.
The search strategy applied was a combination of MeSH terms and free text words, including the following keywords: implants, implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), bridges, implant-supported single crowns (SCs), cement-retained, cement fixation, cement, cementation, ce …
The search strategy applied was a combination of MeSH terms and free text words, including the following keywords: implants, implant-support …
Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review.
Gaonkar SH, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mascarenhas K, Amin B, Rajagopal P. Gaonkar SH, et al. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jan-Mar;21(1):3-10. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_100_20. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021. PMID: 33835063 Free PMC article.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The major prosthetic complication was the fracture of the acrylic prosthesis. ...
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The major prosthetic complication was the fracture of the acrylic pr …
Long-Term Effectiveness of Extra-Short (≤ 6 mm) Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.
Ravidà A, Barootchi S, Askar H, Suárez-López Del Amo F, Tavelli L, Wang HL. Ravidà A, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):68-84. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6893. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019. PMID: 30695086

Additionally, a statistically significant difference in terms of bone loss was observed between tissue-level (0.12 mm) and bone-level implants (0.36 mm) at 12 months (P < .01), but not between internal and external abutment connections (P = .17). The most commonly reported

Additionally, a statistically significant difference in terms of bone loss was observed between tissue-level (0.12 mm) and bone-level implan …