Search Page
Save citations to file
Email citations
Send citations to clipboard
Add to Collections
Add to My Bibliography
Create a file for external citation management software
Your saved search
Your RSS Feed
Filters
Results by year
Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.
Year | Number of Results |
---|---|
2015 | 1 |
2016 | 1 |
2024 | 0 |
Search Results
2 results
Results by year
Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
An evidence-based treatment algorithm for the management of WHO Grade II and III meningiomas.
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Mar;38(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14757.
Neurosurg Focus. 2015.
PMID: 25727225
Review.
The management of WHO Grade II "atypical" meningiomas (AMs) and Grade III "malignant" meningiomas (MMs) remains controversial and under-investigated in prospective studies. The roles of surgery, radiation therapy, radiosurgery, and chemotherapy have be …
The management of WHO Grade II "atypical" meningiomas (AMs) and Grade III "malignant" meningiomas (MMs) remains controv …
Review of controversies in management of non-benign meningioma.
Paldor I, Awad M, Sufaro YZ, Kaye AH, Shoshan Y.
Paldor I, et al.
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Sep;31:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
J Clin Neurosci. 2016.
PMID: 27338209
Review.
GTR correlates less closely to outcome in Grade III meningioma compared to subtotal resection (STR). Extreme measures to completely resect Grade III meningioma are not warranted. ...RT improves outcome following STR of Grade II …
GTR correlates less closely to outcome in Grade III meningioma compared to subtotal resection (STR). Extreme measures t …
Item in Clipboard
Cite
Cite