Wing DA - Search Results

1

Induction of labor: the misoprostol controversy.

Goldberg AB, Wing DA. Goldberg AB, et al. Among authors: wing da. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;48(4):244-8. doi: 10.1016/s1526-9523(03)00087-4. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003. PMID: 12867908 Review.

2

Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a delivery system with accurate dosing and rapid discontinuation.

Stephenson ML, Hawkins JS, Powers BL, Wing DA. Stephenson ML, et al. Among authors: wing da. Womens Health (Lond). 2014 Jan;10(1):29-36. doi: 10.2217/whe.13.49. Womens Health (Lond). 2014. PMID: 24328596 Free article. Review.

3

Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Wing DA, Rahall A, Jones MM, Goodwin TM, Paul RH. Wing DA, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;172(6):1811-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91416-1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 7778637 Clinical Trial.

4

A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.

Wing DA, Paul RH. Wing DA, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):158-64. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70267-3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996. PMID: 8694043 Clinical Trial.

5

A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH. Wing DA, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Sep;177(3):612-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70154-6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID: 9322632 Clinical Trial.

6

A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Wing DA, Ham D, Paul RH. Wing DA, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 May;180(5):1155-60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70610-1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999. PMID: 10329871 Clinical Trial.

7

Labor induction with misoprostol.

Wing DA. Wing DA. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Aug;181(2):339-45. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70558-2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999. PMID: 10454679 Review.

8

A randomized comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction.

Wing DA, Park MR, Paul RH. Wing DA, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;95(6 Pt 1):905-8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00815-2. Obstet Gynecol. 2000. PMID: 10831989 Clinical Trial.

9

Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.

Wing DA, Paul RH. Wing DA, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul;179(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70256-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998. PMID: 9704771 Clinical Trial.

10

Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Wing DA, Tran S, Paul RH. Wing DA, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1237-40; discussion 1240-3. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123740. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 12066104

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

225 results

Search Page