Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1905 1
1908 1
1911 2
1916 2
1921 1
1922 2
1923 4
1924 1
1925 1
1926 2
1927 2
1928 3
1932 1
1933 2
1934 2
1935 1
1936 2
1937 1
1945 7
1946 17
1947 22
1948 20
1949 37
1950 39
1951 61
1952 66
1953 60
1954 70
1955 62
1956 70
1957 72
1958 76
1959 38
1960 18
1961 14
1962 25
1963 79
1964 135
1965 101
1966 103
1967 88
1968 102
1969 113
1970 119
1971 133
1972 140
1973 164
1974 144
1975 392
1976 385
1977 445
1978 489
1979 528
1980 493
1981 630
1982 633
1983 763
1984 823
1985 782
1986 1013
1987 1187
1988 1417
1989 1751
1990 1842
1991 1973
1992 2080
1993 2140
1994 2400
1995 2694
1996 2800
1997 3039
1998 3309
1999 3606
2000 4073
2001 4412
2002 4821
2003 5182
2004 5630
2005 6287
2006 6676
2007 7200
2008 7755
2009 7926
2010 8085
2011 8373
2012 9090
2013 10027
2014 12384
2015 14351
2016 15534
2017 15934
2018 17165
2019 17595
2020 18622
2021 20063
2022 20015
2023 18846
2024 8903

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

280,529 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Showing results for d test
Your search for dotest retrieved no results
Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.
Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ. Fritz CO, et al. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):2-18. doi: 10.1037/a0024338. Epub 2011 Aug 8. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012. PMID: 21823805
For t tests, 2/3 of the articles did not report an associated effect size estimate; Cohen's d was the most often reported. We provide a straightforward guide to understanding, selecting, calculating, and interpreting effect sizes for many types of data and to methods for c …
For t tests, 2/3 of the articles did not report an associated effect size estimate; Cohen's d was the most often reported. We provide …
Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta-analysis.
Lin L, Aloe AM. Lin L, et al. Stat Med. 2021 Jan 30;40(2):403-426. doi: 10.1002/sim.8781. Epub 2020 Nov 12. Stat Med. 2021. PMID: 33180373 Free PMC article.
Meta-analyses of a treatment's effect compared with a control frequently calculate the meta-effect from standardized mean differences (SMDs). SMDs are usually estimated by Cohen's d or Hedges' g. Cohen's d divides the difference between sample means of a continuous …
Meta-analyses of a treatment's effect compared with a control frequently calculate the meta-effect from standardized mean differences (SMDs) …
Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews.
Garritty C, Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-Streit B, King VJ, Hamel C, Kamel C, Affengruber L, Stevens A. Garritty C, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 15. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021. PMID: 33068715 Free PMC article.
OBJECTIVES: To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for decision-making purposes including urgent health issues of high priority. STUDY DESIGN AND S …
OBJECTIVES: To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to re …
Numerology.
Dauter Z, Baker T. Dauter Z, et al. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2007 Mar;63(Pt 3):275. doi: 10.1107/S0907444907005185. Epub 2007 Feb 21. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2007. PMID: 17327662 No abstract available.
[Health research methodology].
Ferté T, Canete S. Ferté T, et al. Rev Prat. 2023 Sep;73(7):803-807. Rev Prat. 2023. PMID: 37796275 French. No abstract available.
Read and apply CONSORT!
Laccourreye O, Jankowski R. Laccourreye O, et al. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2022 May;139(3):117-118. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 4. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2022. PMID: 34742655 Free article. No abstract available.
Recognising bias in studies of diagnostic tests part 2: interpreting and verifying the index test.
Kea B, Hall MK, Wang R. Kea B, et al. Emerg Med J. 2019 Aug;36(8):501-505. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208447. Epub 2019 Jun 20. Emerg Med J. 2019. PMID: 31221671 Free PMC article.
Our conceptual model includes three stages: patient selection, interpretation of the index test and disease verification. In part 2, we focus on (1) Interpretation bias (or workup bias): where the classification of an indeterminate index test result can bias the acc …
Our conceptual model includes three stages: patient selection, interpretation of the index test and disease verification. In part 2, …
A cat study.
Brink PJ. Brink PJ. West J Nurs Res. 2002 Apr;24(3):225-7. doi: 10.1177/01939450222045860. West J Nurs Res. 2002. PMID: 11911377 No abstract available.
280,529 results
You have reached the last available page of results. Please see the User Guide for more information.